year 10, Issue 1 (Journal of Acoustical Engineering Society of Iran 2022)                   مجله انجمن علوم صوتی ایران (مهندسی صوتیات سابق) 2022, 10(1): 34-45 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Zarei A, Ghasemi A, Sadeghi H, Gholamipour M. Combining pattern recognition and deep-learning-based algorithms to automatically detect commercial quadcopters using audio signals (Research Article). مجله انجمن علوم صوتی ایران (مهندسی صوتیات سابق) 2022; 10 (1) :34-45
URL: http://joasi.ir/article-1-246-en.html
Abstract:   (1106 Views)
Commercial quadcopters with many private, commercial, and public sector applications are a rapidly advancing technology. Currently, there is no guarantee to facilitate the safe operation of these devices in the community. Three different automatic commercial quadcopters identification methods are presented in this paper. Among these three techniques, two are based on deep neural networks in which all the feature extraction and classification processes are performed automatically. Deep learning-based methods include the convolutional neural network (CNN), LTSM networks, and a combination of those. The third method is presented using cepstral coefficients and support vector machines. In deep learning-based algorithms, the spectral patterns extracted from the commercial quadcopters' sounds are used as input data. The spectral patterns are obtained by applying the short-time Fourier transform method to the acoustic data. Besides, the cepstral coefficients and the support vector machines are used in the third method to identify and classify the received acoustic signals. The performance of the deep learning and cepstrum coefficients-based methods are compared using the acoustic datasets recorded from the commercial quadcopters. The results show that all three presented methods have adequate performance in identifying the quadcopters. However, the LSTM-CNN method had the best performance by providing an average accuracy of 95.31%, average sensitivity of 96.24%, and average specificity of 95.61%.
 
Full-Text [PDF 87 kb]   (901 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Signal Processing
Received: 2022/05/16 | Accepted: 2022/07/14 | Published: 2022/09/22

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.